DOI: https://doi.org/10.31071/kit2020.16.08

Inventory reference

ISSN 1812-7231 Klin.inform.telemed. Volume 15, Issue 16, 2020, Pages 121-128

Author(s)

O. A. Panchenko^1,2, V. G. Antonov¹

Institution(s)

¹State Institution "Scientific-Practical Medical Rehabilitating-Diagnostic Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukrainian", Kyiv

²Ukrainian Professional Psychiatric League, Kyiv

Article title

Factors of information security of social development in public administration

Abstract (resume)

Introduction. Modern turbulent state of society actualizes need for scientifically based methods and technological solutions to improve the information security system not only for the state, but also for society and the person in particular.

Objective. To highlight the significant factors of information security of social development and to study the role of public administration in the context of the actualization of information threats and risks.

Study results. The article considers the essence of state management approaches to information security based on interpretation in terms of risk management. Information security is presented as a dynamic system that needs balance. Balance can be disturbed by external and internal factors. The 8 most significant factors that need to be taken into account to develop effective models of public administration in the field of information security are identified. 4 paradigms of information security management (systemic, synergetic, phenomenological and cognitive) which can be involved are considered. However, they are not universal and separate in any particular case, that is they are systemic in nature, and security management should be based on their integrated application depending on the situation and the specifics of the management process. Based on the analysis of the classical model of maintaining the state balance of a dynamic system, it is concluded that it can be used to ensure information security. A model is proposed to explain the reasons for the imbalance of the dynamic system of information security under the action of factors of influence and the risks that accompany them, and to determine the measures of public administration to ensure it.

Conclusion. The model is proposed to explain the reasons for the imbalance of the dynamic system of information security under the action of factors of influence and the risks that accompany them, and to determine the measures of public administration to ensure it.

Keywords

Information security, Information security factors, Society, Public administration, Information security model

References

1. Grinberg R. S. Basic problems of the modern turbulent world. Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii [Humanitarians of the South of Russia], 2013, vol. 0, no. 2, pp. 22–28. (In Russ.).

2. Rozov N. S. Eras of turbulence and their overcoming. Politiya [Polity], 2019, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 81–96. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2019-92-1-81-96

3. Panchenko O. A. Informatsiyna bezpeka v epokhu turbulentnosti: derzhavno-upravlinskyy aspekt [Information security in the epoch of turbulence: state-governing aspect], Monograph. Kiev. KVIZ Publ., 2016, 332 p. (In Ukr.).

4. Kormich B. A. Orhanizatsiyno-pravovi zasady polityky informatsiynoyi bezpeky Ukrayiny [Organizational and legal principles of information security policy of Ukraine], Odessa, Legal literature Publ., 2003, 472 p. (In Ukr.).

5. Kavun S. V. Informatsiyna bezpeka [Information security]. Textbook. Kharkiv, HNEU Publ., 2009, 368 p. (In Ukr.).

6. Tykhomyrov O. Ensuring information security: theoretical and legal aspect. Pravo Ukrayiny [Law of Ukraine], 2011, № 4, pp. 252–259. (In Ukr.).

7. Panchenko O. A., Banchuk N.V. Informazionnaya bezopasnost lichnosti [Information security of a person], Monograph, Kiev, KIT Publ., 2011, 672 p. (In Russ.).

8. Muravs'ka (Yakubivs'ka) YU.YE. Information security of society: conceptual analysis. Ekonomika i suspil'stvo [Economy and society], 2017, no. № 9, pp. 289–294. (In Ukr.).

9. Bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti: ucheb. dlya vuzov. [Life security]. Textbook. for universities. Under total. ed. S. V. Belova. M. Vysshaya shkola [Higher school Publ.], 1999, 40 p. (In Russ.).

10. Ursul A. D., Tsyrdya T. (F) .N. Information Security. Essence, content and principles of its provision. (In Russ.).
http://security.ase.md/publ/ru/pubru22.html (date of circulation: 12.12.2020).

11. Shchekotin E. V. Problem of well-being in a turbulent society: the aspect of security. Vestnik nauki Sibiri [Bulletin of Science of Siberia], 2017, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 74–83. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/22/S09.058

12. Shchekotin E. V. Social management in a turbulent society: issues of security and risk. Sotsium i vlast' [Society and power], 2016, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 87–92. (In Russ.).

13. Panchenko O. A., Parkhomenko-Kutsevil O. I., Antonov V. G. Information challenges of the era of turbulence in public administration. Publichne upravlinnya ta mytne administruvannya: Seriya "Derzhavne upravlinnya" [Public Administration and Customs Administration: Public Administration Series], 2020, vol. 25, № 25, pp. 196–204 (In Ukr.)
https://doi.org/10.32836/2310-9653-2020-2.34

14. Stinchcombe A. Constructing Social Theories. Chicago. University of Chicago Press. 1987, 320 p.

15. Golovko N. V. Entrepreneurial University and A. Stinchcomba's functionalism. Vestn. Novosib. gos. un-ta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: Philosophy], 2014, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 53–61. (In Russ.).

Full-text version http://kit-journal.com.ua/en/viewer_en.html?doc/2020_16/008.pdf