DOI: https://doi.org/10.31071/kit2021.17.12

Inventory reference

ISSN 1812-7231(print), ISSN 2786-5800 (Online) Klin. inform. telemed. Volume 16, Issue 17, 2021, Pages 12-27

Author(s)

Ariana-Anamaria Cordos, Tudor Calinici, Sorana D. Bolboaca’

Institution(s)

Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Department XII — Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, «Iuliu Hatieganu» University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Article title

Doctors’ access and dissemination of medical information through social media

Abstract (resume)

Aim. The purpose of the study was to analyze the way in which doctors, in contract with the Health Insurance House in Romania use social media (SM) in accessing and disseminating medical information.

Material and method. Family doctors and dentists who during the year 2017 had a contract with the Romanian National Health Insurance House represented the targeted sample. 8,497 e-mail addresses and 5,422 telephone numbers were identified and collected from the web page of the National Health Insurance House. The invitation to participate in the study (including the link to the online questionnaire) was sent by SMS, Whatsapp, and/or e-mail during 24 May–14 July 2017. The experimental design was cross-sectional. In the statistical analysis the following generations were defined: «Baby Boomers», aged between 51–70 years, Generation X as people aged 38–51 and Millennials under 38 years.

Results. One hundred and twenty valid questionnaires were analized. The profile of the respondent was women (61%), from urban (71%), specialist physician (50%) working in privat practice (70%). The majority of respondents use Facebook (85%). Generation X connect more to SM from public places as compared to Baby Boomers (p = 0,007). Doctors seek medical information on SM monthly (83%) but rarely give advice through SM to colleagues (28%) or contribute to patients’ medical education (32%). Most physicians interact with their patients through SM (59%), but do not discuss with them about how to search for health information.

Conclusion. SM has a low usage among the doctors who perform their medical activity in Romania. As expected, age is a factor that determines the susceptibility of SM usage by Romanian doctors. SM is mainly used to search medical information but not contribute to patients’ medical education.

Keywords

Social Media (SM); Physician; Health Information

References

1. Alsobayel H. Use of Social Media for Professional Development by Health Care Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey. JMIR Med Educ, 2013, vol. 2, no. 2, p. e15.

2. Amazon, 2017. Top Sites in Romania - Alexa 2017. Available at: https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/RO

3. Antheunis M., Tates K. & Nieboer T. Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns, 2013, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 426-431.

4. Batch Y., Yusof M. & Noah S. ICDTag: A Prototype for a Web-Based System for Organizing Physician-Written Blog Posts Using a Hybrid Taxonomy-Folksonomy Approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2013, vol. 15, no. 2, p. e41.

5. Bolboaca S., Cordos, A. & Drugan C., n.d. Social Media and Health-Related Information: Surveys Development and Validation. s.l., s.n.

6. Brown J., Ryan C. & Harris A. How doctors view and use social media: a national survey. Journal of medical Internet research, 2014, vol. 16(12), p. e267.

7. Campbell L., Evans Y., Pumper M. & Moreno M. Social media use by physicians: a qualitative study of the new frontier of medicine. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016, vol. 16, p.91.

8. Cochrane A., McDonald J. & Brady R. Social Media Use among United Kingdom Vascular Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Vasc Surg, 2016, vol. 33, pp. 25–257.

9. Collins K., Shiffman D. & Rock J. How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?. PloS one, 2016, vol.11, no. 10, p. e0162680.

10. Cordos, A., Bolboaca S. & Drugan T. How social physicians are? A generation-split analysis of the attitudes towards the use of social media among Romanian physicians. Iasi, Romania, s.n., 2019, pp. 1-4.

11. Cordos, A., Bolboaca S., Drugan T. & Drugan C. Social net-working and the use of health-related information. E-health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB), 2015, pp. 1–4.

12. Fuoco M. & Leveridge M. Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists. BJU Int, 2015, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 491-497.

13. gemiusAudience, 2017. Romania: TOP5 social networks, 2017.[Online] Available at: https://www.gemius.com/all-reader-news/romania-top5-social-networks.html [Accessed January 2019].

14. Google n.d. Google Forms. Available at: https://www.google.com/forms/about/ [Accessed 20 June 2020].

15. Hootsuite 2017. Digital Yearbook - Internet, Social Media, and Mobile Data for 239 Countries Around the World. 2017. Available at: http://www.mikekujawski.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/We-Are-Social-Digital-Yearkbook-2017.pdf

16. Keller B. et al. Mind the Gap: Social Media Engagement by Public. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2014, vol. 16, no. 1, p. e8.

17. Koontz N. et al. Social Media Utilization at an Academic Radiology Practice. Acad Radiol, 2018, vol.25, no. 1, pp. 111–117.

18. Lander S., Sanders, J., Cook, P. & O’Malley, N. 2017. Social Media in Pediatric Orthopedics. Journal of pediatric orthopedics, 2017, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. e436–9.

19. Lau A. Hospital-Based Nurses’ Perceptions of the Adoption of Web 2.0 Tools for Knowledge Sharing, Learning, Social Interaction and the Production of Collective Intelligence. J Med Internet Res, 2011, vol. 13, no. 4, p. e92.

20. Long X. et al. Evolving use of social media among Chinese urologists: Opportunity or challenge? PloS one, 2017, vol. 12, no. 7, p. e0181895.

21. Manciuc C. et al. Access to digital and social media among Romanian HIV/AIDS clinical providers. Glob Health Action, 2018 vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1513445.

22. Markert J. Demographics of Age: Generational and Cohort Confusion. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 2004, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 11–25.

23. McGowan B. et al. Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. J. Med. Internet Res., 2012, vol. 14, no. 5.

24. Park E. et al. Information needs of Botswana health care workers and perceptions of Wikipedia. Int J Med Inform, 2016, vol. 95, pp. 8–16.

25. PRC — Pew Research Center. Defining generations: Where Millennials end and post-Millennials begin, 2018, s.l.: s.n.

26. Ramkumar P. et al. Social Media in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery: An Analysis of Twitter and Instagram. Int J Sports Med, 2018, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 564–570.

27. Ranschaert E., Van Ooijen P., McGinty G. & Parizel P. Radiologists’ Usage of Social Media: Results of the RANSOM Survey. Journal of digital imaging, 2016, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 443–449.

28. Statcounter. Social Media Stats Romania, 2018 | StatCounter Global Stats. [Online] Available at: http://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/romania/#monthly-201701-201712

29. Surani Z. et al. Social media usage among health care providers. BMC Research Notes, 2017, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 654.

Full-text version http://kit-journal.com.ua/en/viewer_en.html?doc/2021_17/12.pdf